Install packages in miktex for texmaker3/20/2024 ![]() ![]() 264719 files and directories currently installed.) Selecting previously unselected package freeglut3:amd64. Texlive-plain-generic texlive-pstricks texmaker texmaker-data tipaĠ upgraded, 31 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded.Īfter this operation, 545 MB of additional disk space will be used. The following NEW packages will be installed: Libspreadsheet-parseexcel-perl texlive-latex-extra-doc texlive-latex-recommended-doc dot2tex prerex ruby-tcltk | libtcltk-ruby texlive-pictures-doc vprerex texlive-pstricks-doc texlive-lang-all ![]() Libencode-hanextra-perl libpod2-base-perl perl-tk chktex dvidvi dvipng fragmaster lacheck latexdiff latexmk purifyeps xindy texlive-fonts-recommended-doc texlive-latex-base-doc python-pygments icc-profiles Texlive-plain-generic texlive-pstricks texmaker-data tipa Preview-latex-style ps2eps tex-gyre texlive-base texlive-extra-utils texlive-font-utils texlive-fonts-recommended texlive-lang-english texlive-latex-base texlive-latex-extra texlive-latex-recommended texlive-pictures The following additional packages will be installed:Īsymptote asymptote-doc fonts-lmodern fonts-texgyre freeglut3 libfile-homedir-perl libfile-which-perl libmime-charset-perl libosmesa6 libqt5printsupport5 libsombok3 libunicode-linebreak-perl libyaml-tiny-perl lmodern I attach the output of sudo apt-get install texmaker. In particular, there seems to be a chain of errors related to the processing of texlive packages, and something connected to kpsewhich also a lot of things connected to dependencies which need to be installed but can't be configured. Now, when I try to reinstall TexMaker, I find out that it needs TexLive packages as well, and it yields the same errors as when trying to install TexLive. I have looked at several questions on this site and used them to remove any residue of TexLive(see ) I purged texmf and ~/.texlive. By comparison, TinyTeX’s pdflatex works just fine.I have been using MikTex with TexMaker as a compiler/editor.Īt one point, I tried to remove MikTex and switch to TexLive, which didn't work as the installation got corrupted. Although it was not MiKTeX’s fault in this case, MiKTeX’s pdflatex fails when called via system2('pdflatex', 'test.tex', stdout = FALSE) in the R console in RStudio, even though system2('pdflatex', 'test.tex') succeeds, which is a really weird bug that took me a long time to realize. The rmarkdown bug #1285 once again confirmed that TinyTeX could be a better option than MiKTeX on Windows. Convenience outweighs the potential risk of letting certain software install (random) packages automatically in this case. What would you do otherwise in this case? Just stare at the screen, let LaTeX fail, and feel the miserable life? I don’t think you want to do that. However, from the viewpoint of users, I guess 99.99% of users will agree to install the missing packages. In the MiKTeX Console (you can find it from the Start menu on Windows), choose “Always install missing packages on-the-fly”:įrom the viewpoint of the developer, it is absolutely the right thing to do to ask users before installing the missing LaTeX packages. I’m still not sure why it could fail (I feel when MiKTeX is installed by the system admin, it may fail to pop up the dialog), but you can change the default setting and let MiKTeX install the missing LaTeX packages without asking. ![]() The default behavior of MiKTeX is to ask you whether you want to install missing LaTeX packages, but it may fail to pop up the dialog box to ask you in the first place. While debugging the rmarkdown issue #1285, I discovered that MiKTeX might fail to install missing LaTeX packages in certain cases. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |